Almost every international player has established its distribution activities in London, including European producers.
The time has come: the United Kingdom is leaving the EU. The "process," as they say here in London, "is a mess," but the divorce comes, hard or soft. Media companies have only started to realize what that will mean for them in recent months: the short-term willingness to take action (as so often in the media) is suddenly high. International players who felt comfortable in London for years seem to be moving quickly and are leaving the perfidious Albion. The British media watchdog Ofcom only calculated that British TV and film production had reached a value of more than 3 billion euros. So there is quite a lot at stake ...
The greatest impact is expected from television channels. The British government has been very liberal with broadcasting permits since the Thatcher era. I myself have experienced in several meetings with British media authorities how British TV channels were tightly restricted in the field of product placement, for example. However, little was done in the way of foreign TV channels. The famous U-turn was already "sold" by the British to foreign TV channels before it came into being in Luxembourg. Particularly in Scandinavia, this was used enthusiastically. SBS and Viasat / TV3 are the best-known examples of channels that established themselves in London, just as RTL Nederland chose Luxembourg as their location.
In addition, most American channel groups found London a pleasant location. Discovery and Viacom, especially through its subsidiary MTV, were examples of media companies settling in London. Ofcom has now issued more than 1000 broadcasting licenses, of which more than 700 are aimed at abroad! In the wake of these broadcasters, many foreign producers also settled in London. I also enjoyed this myself when I was asked by Ronald Goes to assist in setting up Warner Bros' international TV production operations from London, a great adventure. Universal, Sony, and many others also established their European headquarters in London. This makes sense, because the ties between the UK and the US are still close and the American top managers felt more at home in London than in Paris or Luxembourg.
In addition, London became the epicenter for the trade in TV programs and formats. Almost every international player has established its distribution activities in London, including European producers. British companies had, of course, been doing this for years, were well acquainted with the international channels and had tremendous success in exporting British content around the world. A very lucrative business was thus developed, the United Kingdom rivals the United States market leader.
Is this unique ecosystem endangered by Brexit? The international channels seem to choose their eggs for their money and apply for broadcasting licenses en masse in other countries. Discovery opted especially for Bavaria and received permits for 19 TV channels within a month. Turner and Universal followed. Discovery also opened a dependence in Amsterdam. MTV has already migrated some of its channels to the Netherlands and seems to choose our country. On top of it all is the BBC: natural overspill is a thing of the past, Auntie Beep is also going to apply for European broadcasting licenses. The battle seems to be between Amsterdam and Brussels.
International media players will also be hosting their IP catalogs outside the UK. The Netherlands has long been a favorite location in this field and will remain so in the future. It will not surprise anyone if international distribution activities leave London in its wake. It is already clear: the London media world will also be predominantly British after Brexit.
Two years ago, I predicted that the MIP fairs in Cannes were doomed. After the COVID crisis, particularly the Americans and Asians struggled to find their way back to Cannes, the bunker-like Palais was half-empty, and the fair had become a depressing affair. The recent MIPCOM couldn’t have been more different: the sun was shining, exchanges with industry peers were intense, and the spirit was fully restored. Half of my earlier prediction proved accurate: the spring MIP has indeed perished. However, MIPCOM is back in full swing and is here to last.
The reason? MIPCOM is increasingly becoming a meeting place for the international media world. It’s no longer a marketplace; instead it is primarily a place to exchange ideas and uncover the latest trends. It was heartwarming to see young producers from the Benelux excelling: Rutger Beckers from Sputnik in Belgium, Jeroen Koopman from Newbe and Wouter van der Pauw from Signal.Stream. Wouter and his partner, Giel de Winter, are succeeding in reaching generations that have turned away from broadcast television. Their rapidly growing company mainly produces for streamers and recently delivered the series Het Jachtseizoen for Videoland. John de Mol often has a nose for this type of talent and was quick to acquire a stake in Signal.
Nevertheless, there was still a bit of complaining from the many producers present, regardless of where they came from. The days of "peak TV" are over: streamers have stopped making heavy marketing investments in content, and the American industry is back on track after the big strikes. This last factor mainly affects British and Australian producers, who had cleverly filled the gap in the U.S. The market has returned to square one and production volumes are back to normal levels. This brings a major advantage: consumers are no longer overwhelmed with excessive content offerings.
Naturally, much was said about the mega-changes taking place in our market. Evan Shapiro, who has made a name as a "media cartographer," offered insight into something we all knew: young people in the 16-34 age group hardly watch broadcast television anymore. This percentage has dropped further, from nearly 20% in the UK in 2022 to 14% in 2024. Social video and streaming continue to grow, and advertisers are naturally following suit. Broadcasters will have to develop their streaming activities as quickly as possible to maximize digital reach.
In this perfect storm, it’s also crucial for producers to embrace new opportunities. Young entrepreneurs like Wouter van der Pauw, Rutger Beckers, and Jeroen Koopman are eager to take advantage of these opportunities. It will be interesting to see if the large, consolidated production companies will also be able to crack the code of young viewers. That’s the challenge facing many of the MIPCOM attendees.
Taco began his career on the content-production side, at SBS, before transitioning to public broadcasting in 2009, where he led KRO. After overseeing the merger with NCRV in 2014, Taco became CEO of IDTV (part of All3media) in 2017. At IDTV, he formed a creative team that developed the hit show De Verraders. From 2021 to 2024, he led All3media’s companies in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany. Taco also earned his PhD in 2014, showcasing his dedication to learning and expertise.
Oege Boonstra, partner at 3Rivers, says: “We are thrilled to welcome Taco to our team. His deep expertise in both the creative and operational aspects of the media industry, combined with his strategic insight, will be invaluable to our clients. His experience in media management and talent development aligns perfectly with our mission to drive success for media companies.”
Taco Rijssemus on his new role: “I’m excited to join 3Rivers and collaborate with such a skilled team. The media landscape is constantly evolving, and I look forward to applying my experience to help our clients navigate these changes and achieve meaningful results.”
The streaming market is gradually becoming mature. There will still be significant growth, but the tumultuous numbers from the early phase are now behind us. The number of new entrants of any significant size is also drying up, so we can gradually begin to take stock: which companies will survive, which will fail, and what new developments can we still expect?
Let's start with the latter. A few years ago, it seemed that local players could only compete with the big American Tech competitors by working together intensively. In hindsight, this has not materialized at all. Initiatives like the French Salto went under, Britbox eventually became a ‘BBC only’ endeavor (ITV sold its share), we hear little about the Flemish Streamz, and NLZiet in the Netherlands is now cleverly positioned as an alternative to cable, while NPO and RTL are building their own streaming platforms.
Most broadcasters have now realized the critical importance of their brand and are eager to add a +, Play, or MAX behind their names to establish their presence in the digital world. By using the content budget both analog and digital and coming up with smart combinations, they are able to create a new future. With good technology now widely available and no longer a significant barrier, there is no doubt that local broadcasters take charge of their own digital future to survive. The latest in that lineup is Channel 5 in the United Kingdom, which is going to exploit all digital activities under one brand name, 5.
Moreover, the major international media players face significant challenges in keeping their traditional businesses afloat. The write-offs that Paramount and Warner Discovery (WBD) have taken in recent months (each amounting to nearly ten billion dollars!) speak volumes. The traditional business is increasingly under pressure, and investors see that too. For instance, WBD’s stock received a downgrade from Standard & Poor's (to negative). That must cause a lot of pain in the boardrooms.
What does all this mean for the streaming market? First of all, it means that many more local brands will survive than previously thought. All traditional broadcasters are rapidly transforming into digital media companies because they know that otherwise their days are numbered. While the number of local players increases, the number of international players will, however, shrink. The large American media companies are under immense pressure and can no longer afford the investments needed to build international streaming services.
Who will be left standing? Netflix, of course, which systematically expands its first-mover advantage. Prime Video, backed by Amazon's commercial engine. Disney, naturally, with its broad portfolio, will survive despite the painful managerial road it has traveled. And the aforementioned WBD, which continues to invest heavily in (HBO)MAX. Finally, DAZN, though it is still burning through cash. With Apple, you never know. But the other international players are not going to make it. That is certainly something few could have predicted three years ago...